Difference between revisions of "Talk:About OpenZFS"
Grahamperrin (talk | contribs) (Plone Foundation as an exemplar.) |
Grahamperrin (talk | contribs) (→The project and its projects: new section) |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
--[[User:Grahamperrin|Grahamperrin]] ([[User talk:Grahamperrin|talk]]) 04:33, 15 September 2013 (UTC) | --[[User:Grahamperrin|Grahamperrin]] ([[User talk:Grahamperrin|talk]]) 04:33, 15 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
== The project and its projects == | |||
Food for thought … first impressions to newcomers … as currently drafted, the site includes: | |||
* the '''OpenZFS [[OpenZFS_Project | project]]''' | |||
* '''OpenZFS [[projects]]''' – ''active projects'' and three categories of ''ideas'' – and I guess that only some of these are (or will be) led by the OpenZFS project. | |||
Wonder whether: | |||
* the ''Projects'' page could be renamed to ''Activities'' | |||
** with two main headings ''Work in progress'' and ''Ideas'' | |||
*** and subheadings beneath the latter: ''Inter-platform coordination'', ''General features'', ''Lustre features''. | |||
(There's nearly always some form of activity around an idea – chat is an activity, and so on.) | |||
--[[User:Grahamperrin|Grahamperrin]] ([[User talk:Grahamperrin|talk]]) 05:05, 15 September 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:05, 15 September 2013
Goals here should be consistent with, and maybe more detailed than, goals at the main page.
--Grahamperrin (talk) 08:33, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Logos, texts, licensing, permission
Are all logos – in particular, those at Companies and organizations – truly Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike?
--Grahamperrin (talk) 09:18, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
No, the logos are used with permission; the text content is creative commons. Mahrens (talk) 23:32, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Non-Profit Organization
We would like to form a non-profit organization to hold the openzfs assets. Perhaps a foundation? Or become part of an existing foundation to avoid some legal work? More research is needed here. Would appreciate feedback from anyone with more experience.
Mahrens (talk) 04:15, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
If the OpenZFS project envisages an OpenZFS Foundation:
- the Plone Foundation may be exemplary.
--Grahamperrin (talk) 04:33, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
The project and its projects
Food for thought … first impressions to newcomers … as currently drafted, the site includes:
- the OpenZFS project
- OpenZFS projects – active projects and three categories of ideas – and I guess that only some of these are (or will be) led by the OpenZFS project.
Wonder whether:
- the Projects page could be renamed to Activities
- with two main headings Work in progress and Ideas
- and subheadings beneath the latter: Inter-platform coordination, General features, Lustre features.
- with two main headings Work in progress and Ideas
(There's nearly always some form of activity around an idea – chat is an activity, and so on.)
--Grahamperrin (talk) 05:05, 15 September 2013 (UTC)