Difference between revisions of "Feature Flags"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
9 bytes added ,  17:55, 4 February 2017
m
Oops; not Oracle.
(Clarity (recent misunderstanding about version 28); Wayback Machine for a blog post that is no longer served by illumos; a FreeBSD manual page that is not version-specific)
m (Oops; not Oracle.)
Line 1: Line 1:
ZFS on-disk formats were originally versioned with a single number, which increased whenever the format changed. The numbered approach was suitable when development of ZFS was driven by Oracle alone.  
ZFS on-disk formats were originally versioned with a single number, which increased whenever the format changed. The numbered approach was suitable when development of ZFS was driven by a single organisation.  


For distributed development of OpenZFS, version numbering was unsuitable. Any change to the number would have required agreement, across all implementations, of each change to the on-disk format.  
For distributed development of OpenZFS, version numbering was unsuitable. Any change to the number would have required agreement, across all implementations, of each change to the on-disk format.  
Editor
241

edits

Navigation menu