Editor
241
edits
Grahamperrin (talk | contribs) (Clarity (recent misunderstanding about version 28); Wayback Machine for a blog post that is no longer served by illumos; a FreeBSD manual page that is not version-specific) |
Grahamperrin (talk | contribs) m (Oops; not Oracle.) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
ZFS on-disk formats were originally versioned with a single number, which increased whenever the format changed. The numbered approach was suitable when development of ZFS was driven by | ZFS on-disk formats were originally versioned with a single number, which increased whenever the format changed. The numbered approach was suitable when development of ZFS was driven by a single organisation. | ||
For distributed development of OpenZFS, version numbering was unsuitable. Any change to the number would have required agreement, across all implementations, of each change to the on-disk format. | For distributed development of OpenZFS, version numbering was unsuitable. Any change to the number would have required agreement, across all implementations, of each change to the on-disk format. |